<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Text of the Australian Constitution – As Amended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://australianpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Resources, News &#38; Commentary from Malcolm Farnsworth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 02:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Farnsworth</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Farnsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Common law is recognised by the judicial system but, like many other things, it isn&#039;t stated in the Constitution.  Australia&#039;s legal system is a combination of the common law and statute law made by Parliament.

Municipal - or local - councils are established by state governments, not the Commonwealth.  Each state has a Local Government Act which sets out the powers of local councils.  There was a referendum in 1988 to insert recognition of local government into the Constitution but it failed to pass.  The Gillard government is proposing to hold another referendum at some point over the next three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common law is recognised by the judicial system but, like many other things, it isn&#8217;t stated in the Constitution.  Australia&#8217;s legal system is a combination of the common law and statute law made by Parliament.</p>
<p>Municipal &#8211; or local &#8211; councils are established by state governments, not the Commonwealth.  Each state has a Local Government Act which sets out the powers of local councils.  There was a referendum in 1988 to insert recognition of local government into the Constitution but it failed to pass.  The Gillard government is proposing to hold another referendum at some point over the next three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shim54007</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Shim54007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>where does &#039;common law&#039; sit under the constitution?  Is it recognised? 
Also what is the constitutional basis for a municiple council&#039;s authority to pass new laws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where does &#8216;common law&#8217; sit under the constitution?  Is it recognised?<br />
Also what is the constitutional basis for a municiple council&#8217;s authority to pass new laws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Farnsworth</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Farnsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>The key words in Section 100 are &quot;reasonable use&quot;.  The definition of this, and the process used to establish that definition, are crucial. I&#039;m no lawyer, but in the current situation the consultations, negotiations and joint decisions of the States and the Commonwealth and the Murray-Darling Basin authority would almost certainly be construed as an appropriate attempt to determine &quot;reasonable use&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key words in Section 100 are &#8220;reasonable use&#8221;.  The definition of this, and the process used to establish that definition, are crucial. I&#8217;m no lawyer, but in the current situation the consultations, negotiations and joint decisions of the States and the Commonwealth and the Murray-Darling Basin authority would almost certainly be construed as an appropriate attempt to determine &#8220;reasonable use&#8221;.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawoods1</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawoods1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>Does section 100 give a resident the right to the reasonable use of the waters of rivers for irrigation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does section 100 give a resident the right to the reasonable use of the waters of rivers for irrigation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>This is complete nonsense.  The Australian Constitution establishes a secular system of government, not a theocracy.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is complete nonsense.  The Australian Constitution establishes a secular system of government, not a theocracy.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawstudent</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>lawstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>Nothing in the Constitution forbids religious-based political parties, merely that the parliament may not establish a religion, ie, to make one religion the state religion. This occurs in the United Kingdom, where the Church of England is the &#039;established&#039; church. Hope this answers your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing in the Constitution forbids religious-based political parties, merely that the parliament may not establish a religion, ie, to make one religion the state religion. This occurs in the United Kingdom, where the Church of England is the &#8216;established&#8217; church. Hope this answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Whitlam government legislated to lower the voting age to 18 in 1973.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Whitlam government legislated to lower the voting age to 18 in 1973.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Is section 34 of the constitution still applicable in its original form, or has it been ammended to allow for change to age etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is section 34 of the constitution still applicable in its original form, or has it been ammended to allow for change to age etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Brook</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>Section 41 is interesting. As I understand it this was insisted upon by South Australia to ensure that Aborigines, who had the vote in that colony, would retain the vote in the Commonwealth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 41 is interesting. As I understand it this was insisted upon by South Australia to ensure that Aborigines, who had the vote in that colony, would retain the vote in the Commonwealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Miley</title>
		<link>http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/text/complete/comment-page-1#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Miley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://australianpolitics.com/articles/constitution/full-text-of-the-australian-constitution-as-amended#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>I can find nothing in the Constitution that empowers the Commonwealth to participate in military action, other than of a defensive nature. I assume this would extend to treaty obligations to defend allies or nations subject to agression, but have the impression that the last war in Iraq would have been outside the scope of the Constitutional powers of the Government. Is there anyway of getting advice on this topic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can find nothing in the Constitution that empowers the Commonwealth to participate in military action, other than of a defensive nature. I assume this would extend to treaty obligations to defend allies or nations subject to agression, but have the impression that the last war in Iraq would have been outside the scope of the Constitutional powers of the Government. Is there anyway of getting advice on this topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

