Greens Win Protection Of Voting Rights For Youth And Prisoners
This is the text of a press release by the Australian Greens in March 1999.
A
Greens campaign against Government attempts to
disenfranchise young people and prisoners was successful
when the ALP, the Democrats and Senator Harradine backed
the Greens stand in the Senate.
"This
is a victory for democracy, by stopping Government
legislation that would close the electoral rolls early
before an election, the Senate has protected the
integrity of our electoral system," said Senator
Brown.
The
Senate amended the Electoral and Referendum Amendment
Bill (No. 2) 1998 by blocking Government moves to
close the electoral rolls early and remove voting rights
for all prisoners.
The
Government had proposed that for all new electors the
rolls would close at 6pm on the day of the issue of the
writ for an election.
"It
is estimated that some 80 000 new enrolments occur in the
one week period (that could have been eliminated under
this legislation) before the close of rolls in an
election period.
"The
legislation also proposed removing voting rights for all
people in prison. These measures ran counter to our
obligations under the United Nations International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1991 Article 25(b)
and the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human
Rights 1948 Article 21(1)," said Senator Brown.
"The
legislation would have been racially discriminatory
because Indigenous Australians are vastly
over-represented in prisons.
However,
Senator Brown condemned the Coalition-ALP majority which
voted to give political parties access to the
date-of-birth, gender and salutation details of all
registered voters a move not supported by the
Privacy Commissioner who has said:
"
Where personal information is collected compulsorily I
consider that additional uses or disclosers should only
be authorised if there is a significant and clearly
demonstrated public interest in that happening"
A
Prisoner's Right to Vote.
"The
degree of civilisation in a society can be judged by
entering its prisons" - Dostoevski.
The
Federal Government has been attempting through
legislation to remove voting rights for all prisoners.
The assumption, which many of us have, that prisoners
already have no such rights a telling one.
That
fact - that we often imagine prisoners have no voting
rights - is a measure of how society seeks to de-humanise
those in our jails. In this case literally. By removing
voting rights we take away a crucial ingredient of what
it is to be a citizen and a human being. In a modern
democracy many consider the right to have some say in how
one is governed as the most fundamental of all human
rights.
Once
we remove the right to vote we take away the notion that
someone is part of society. And of course it cuts both
ways. Why should someone who is denied their most basic
citizenship rights adhere to the laws that bind that
society?
Croatia,
the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Japan, Norway,
Poland and Zimbabwe, to name a few, all allow prisoners
full voting rights. But Australia seems likely to follow
the United States example where all but 5 states have
disenfranchised prisoners.
Thirty
years after Australians overwhelming voted to recognise
indigenous Australians as citizens in the famous 1967
referendum, the Howard Government is set to strip
1000's of Aborigines of that hard won right.
Aboriginal
Australians are dramatically over-represented in prisons.
With incarceration rates some 20 times that of the
general population, it's clear who will suffer most
from this legislation.
In
another twist of history this new legislation will
override the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (RDA)
which was designed to prevent just this sought of
indirect discrimination.
The
legislation is also retrospective and arbitrary. Those
already jailed and sentenced prior to this proposed law
will still be subject to its provisions. It is in effect
a fresh punishment imposed on top of the original
sentence without reference to any judge or jury.
It's
also arbitrary because those serving a short sentence
this month or last month will not miss out on casting
their ballot in the looming federal election. But if you
cop a sentence when Howard decides to send the country to
the polls, you will not get a vote. It's pure
potluck.
Already
prisoners who have sentences of 5 years or more are
denied a right to vote. The Keating Government did
propose allowing all prisoners the right to vote but
buckled when it came to introducing legislation in 1995.
In a
pro-law and order' climate with Hanson's
scapegoat politics still alive, those campaigning for
prisoners' rights have a big task at hand but that
famous quote of Dostoevski should be an alarm to us all
"The degree of civilisation in a society
can be judged by entering its prisons"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|