All Posts Tagged With: "economy"

Reserve Bank Cuts Interest Rates By One Percent

The Reserve Bank of Australia has confounded economic pundits by announcing a cut of one full percentage point in interest rates.

The cash rate has been cut from 7% to 6%. The common prediction in recent days had been for a 0.5% cut.

Continued

Howard And Costello Offer Tax Cuts Package

On the first full day of the 2007 election campaign, the coalition has announced a tax package offering income tax reductions across the board.

A re-elected coalition government is proposing to reduce the number of tax brackets to four over a five-year period: 15, 30, 35 and 40 cents in the dollar. It proposes raising the tax-free threshold to $14,000 next year.

The tax cuts are worth more than $34 billion.

The aim of the restructure is to arrive at a tax-free threshold of $20,000 with the top marginal rate set at 40 cents.

The changes were announced by the Prime Minister, John Howard, and the Treasurer, Peter Costello, at a joint press conference in Canberra.

Listen to the joint press conference held by John Howard and Peter Costello:

This is the transcript of the joint press conference held by John Howard and Peter Costello.

HOWARD:

Well ladies and gentlemen the Treasurer and I have called this news conference today to do two things. The Treasurer will be releasing on behalf of the Government the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook and he’ll also be announcing on behalf of the Government a five year plan for further major restructuring of the personal income tax system. It represents the first and certainly a major announcement in a series of announcements which are designed to lay out our plans to improve incentive for workforce participation, to provide the opportunity for people who are feeling cost of living pressures in the community to receive some assistance in dealing with those cost of living pressures; to remind the Australian community of our longstanding belief that you should have incentive in the tax system for effort, for risk taking, for workforce participation - that we believe work in infinitely preferable to welfare.

The tax cuts that are going to be announced and the plan outlined by the Treasurer are a series of tax and is a plan that is eminently affordable. It builds of course on the personal tax cuts contained in the last five Budgets. It gives substance to our assertion that we can further reduce unemployment, drive it down to a level closer to 3.5 per cent because the participation benefits arising from personal income tax reform are very, very significant.

This plan is all about further building and growing the Australian economy. It is about creating more, not less jobs. Unlike Labor’s anti-small business industrial relations system it will lead to more people entering the workforce and it will provide far greater incentive for people who are already there.

Finally, can I say that the economic picture to be outlined by the Treasurer in the mid-year review shows an Australian economy continuing to grow, continuing to perform exceptionally well. The tax reform plan, which is a detailed plan over a period of years, is entirely affordable and consistent with the Government’s objectives in relation to both inflation and interest rates. Treasurer.

COSTELLO:

Thank you very much Prime Minister. First of all I am going to outline the major changes in the mid-year review to what we had at Budget time. I am then going to explain our tax reform plan, which will take place over the next three years. Then I am going to lay out an ambitious tax reform goal for five years time, a goal of where we want to see Australia to be, world class with a competitive tax system and with a tax system which has been absolutely re-cast to enable this country to go for growth.

First of all, since the Budget we have upgraded our growth forecasts for both 2006-07 and 2007-08. Growth in 2006-07 was expected to be 2.5 per cent, in fact the outcome was three and a quarter. Growth in 2007-08 was forecast to be three and three quarter per cent, the new forecast is four and a quarter per cent.

As a consequence of this upgrading of growth and developments in the labour market, we have upgraded employment growth for 2006-07 and 2007-08. In fact in 2007-08 we have upgraded forecast employment growth from one and a half per cent to two and a quarter per cent. The consequence of that is that we now forecast in 2007-08 we will have on average 100,000 additional people in the workforce, higher than we forecast in the May Budget. That 100,000 additional people in the workforce, higher than we forecast in the May Budget, will lead to a growth in revenue for PAYG and increased receipts for superannuation because more people are putting money into superannuation and indeed returns are better. This is part of the story, as you know, of 2.2 million additional people in work since March of 1996.

The announcement that I make today in relation to the tax plan keeps the Budget in surplus above one per cent of GDP over the whole of the forward estimates. That is, this year, next year, 2008-09 and the two projection years out to 2010-11. As you know this puts Australia in a much stronger position than comparable developed economies in the world, all of whom on average in the OECD or the Euro area on average are in deficit, including the United Kingdom, the United States and Japan.

I now turn to the income tax plan which is being announced today. Prior to the reform by this Government of the income tax system there were four rates of tax, 20, 34, 43 and 47, with the top rate of tax commencing on your first dollar of income above $50,000. The effective tax free threshold for low income earners was $6,150. As a result of the announcement in this year’s Budget, our four tax rates, currently in the current financial year are 15, 30, 40 and 45 per cent. The 15 per cent rate goes up to $30,000. The 30 per cent rate which replaced rates of 34, 43 and 47 applies right through middle income areas. People go onto the second top marginal tax rate at $75,000 and the top marginal tax rate for each dollar over $150,000. The effective tax free threshold for low income earners in this financial year is $11,000.

The tax plan which I announce today will next financial year do a number of things. First of all it will lift the effective tax free threshold for low income earners to $14,000 from the current level of $11,000. Secondly it will extend the range of the 15 cent marginal tax rate from $30,000 to $34,000. Thirdly, and this has already been legislated; this is why it’s in blue, the legislated changes that have not yet taken effect will still take effect to increase the 30 cent threshold up to $80,000 and the 40 cent threshold up to $180,000.

That was legislated as part of our two part plan to apply from 1 July. The first part for low income earners, which was the increase in the effective tax free threshold and the increase of the 15 cent rate has already taken effect. That second instalment will take effect but with additional tax relief on the 1st of July for low income earners. The year after, in 2009-10, we will continue to increase the threshold for the 15 cent rate, taking it now from 34 to $35,000 and we will begin to reduce the top marginal tax rate and the second top marginal tax rate, each coming down by 2 cents.

The second top marginal tax rate coming down from 40 cents in the dollar to 38 and the top marginal tax rate coming down from 45 cents to 43 cents. By increasing the low-income tax offset we will also increase the effective tax-free threshold for low income earners to $15,000. The third year we will continue these reforms by again increasing the effective tax-free threshold in 2010 to $16,000 by taking the 15 cent threshold up to $37,000 and by cutting again, this time by one cent, the top marginal tax rate and the second top marginal tax rate. This plan is all to work towards the goal of tax reform which we now set ourselves. Within five years, by 2012-13, four tax rates 15, 30, 35 and 40. That’s why we keep reducing those top two tax rates.

Secondly the goal is to have 45 per cent of Australian taxpayers on a top marginal tax rate of 15 per cent or less. Thirdly to have 85 per cent of Australian taxpayers on a top marginal tax rate of 30 per cent or less. Fourthly, to have 98 per cent of Australian taxpayers on a top marginal tax rate of 35 per cent or less and fifthly, for low income earners who qualify for the low-income tax offset, no tax until they go over $20,000. This is goal we set ourselves over five years.

The plan that I have announced to be implemented in the next three years puts us well within striking distance of meeting that goal. It does it by lifting the effective tax free threshold in the stages I’ve described by reducing the two top tax rates in the stages I’ve described and by lifting the threshold for the 15 cent rate in the stages that I’ve described. Over the three years to 2010-11, as you can see, this will mean that we will have an effective tax free threshold that is for people qualifying for the low income tax offset, no tax until they go above $16,000. The reason we are doing this is to get more – encourage more people to join the workforce and to boost the capacity of the Australian economy. This is part of our go for growth strategy.

Treasury modelling shows that the tax reforms that we have put in place since 2000 have boosted, in a cumulative way, the number of people in the workforce by 300,000 and the changes which we announce today will boost the estimated workforce by around 65,000 people. Encouraging more people into the workforce, particularly by reducing their tax – effective tax free threshold, and particularly by lifting the threshold up until you which you pay 15 cents in the dollar, is boosting the number of people joining Australia’s workforce and this is producing a virtuous cycle. Lower tax encouraging more people into the workforce, more people into the workforce lifting the number in work, increasing the number in work, boosting revenues, boosting revenues allowing us to cut tax. Cutting tax, encouraging more people into the workforce.

These are the results that can be delivered from strong economic growth. This is where we have got ourselves after increasing employment by over two million in this country and this is where we can drive the agenda by increasing the workforce further.

Finally, you will see in the pack that I am about to reduce…to release that from the period of 2002-03 when we began regularly cutting tax, we have cut tax very substantially for people on low incomes. For people on $15,000 we will cut it out entirely. For people on $50,000 they will have a net tax cut which will reduce their tax paid from around $11,380 to $7,850. Let me emphasise: these tax cuts which began with the new tax system in 2000 have continued through our last five budgets and now have the aspirational goal which we announce today, have delivered tax cuts right across the income spectrum but the highest in percentage terms to the lowest income earners, in percentage terms. In dollar terms, of course, because they pay less, the dollar terms are not so great but in percentage terms they have, as a consequence, been the highest.

This tax plan is moving us towards a goal which we set today for a five year period. It will make the Australian taxation system competitive. It will boost employment, it will grow our economy and it is part of setting Australia up for the next generation. Now I’ll ask the staff to release both the mid-year review and the tax release in relation to the income tax cuts.

HOWARD:

Then we’d be happy to take questions. Could I just make one observation that encapsulates the incentive effects. By the year 2010, 65 per cent of women with children in the part-time workforce will face a top marginal tax rate of no more than 15 per cent. Now given that a very typical family employment formation is a full time husband in the workforce or a husband in the full-time workforce, and a mother working part-time, this is a hugely significant figure. 65 per cent by 2010 of women with children in the part-time workforce will face a marginal tax rate of no more than 15 per cent. That is one of the quite stunning implications of this tax reform plan. We’ll distribute it and then we’ll be happy to take questions.

COSTELLO:

Also, I ask my staff to give me a copy of the press release, I didn’t bring one. Please.

JOURNALIST:

Can I ask, what do the tax cuts cost?

COSTELLO:

Yes, the tax cuts cost $34 billion, roughly, over three years. If I can take you to the area where they are in the mid-year review, you will see them in the revenue measures on page 62. $7.1 billion in 2008-09, $10.9 billion in 2009-10, $15.9 billion in 2010-11.

JOURNALIST:

Prime Minister, why are you release the tax policy now? Why decide to go so early…

HOWARD:

Well the right time to release the tax policy is the time of the release of the mid-year economic review so that we are able to say immediately that these tax cuts are fully funded and it’s a very sensible, conservative, logical thing to do.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, (inaudible) consistent with the provision of decent services? Aren’t the polls telling you at the moment that people are keener on the government providing more services and they’re not too fussed about tax cuts?

COSTELLO:

Well can I make the point that the Government will provide decent services and is funding decent services. After this tax cut, as I showed you in my graph, the Budget will still be in surplus by the equivalent or greater of one per cent of GDP. That’s the goal that we’ve also set ourselves to deliver surplus Budgets. Now, we have a situation where we have increased revenue because of a surge in employment. The Government can either hang on to that revenue or return that revenue to taxpayers by building a more competitive tax system. I think it’s a matter of fairness it’s right to return it but also in order to build capacity and to get into this virtuous circle whereby you encourage more people into the workforce, you might be able to do it again in the future. That’s what we’re about when we go for growth.

JOURNALIST:

Aren’t you pumping an enormous amount of money into an already overheated economy, or overheating economy?

HOWARD:

No we’re not. These tax cuts are done in stages. They start with about seven billion from the first of July next year, a larger amount a year later and a still larger amount a year after that. But you’ve got to remember that the things that produce the revenue surge that we have also tell us that unless you return a significant portion of that by way of further tax relief, over time you are going to reduce the incentive for people to work and once you reduce the incentive for people to work you begin to reverse the very positive economic activity that we have at the present time.

JOURNALIST:

So you’re not concerned even though the MYEFO prediction for CPI (inaudible) from 2.5 per cent to (inaudible) closer to the top of the Reserve Bank’s…

HOWARD:

No we’re not because I’ll tell you…one reason why we’re not concerned is that we have an industrial relations system that in fact contains wage pressure. What would be of concern would be a return to a regulated centralised wage fixation system whereby wage increases in very profitable sectors in the economy such as the mining industry flowed through without lead or hindrance to other parts of the economy. You can go back to what Glenn Stevens has said and what Ian Macfarlane have both said that it’s different now then what it was, and the reason is that we have a decentralised wage fixing system.

JOURNALIST:

So you relying on WorkChoices and the wages system to contain inflation?

HOWARD:

Well I’m certainly pointing to the fact that one of the things that helps contain wage increases not based on productivity gains is a more flexible industrial relations system and one of the reasons why now as was the case three years ago that I can say that interest rates will always be lower under the Coalition than under Labor is that we are running a sensible industrial relations system and one that is not centralised and one that’s not regulated in the way Labor would propose. Labor’s industrial relations policy would be of enormous threat to the stability of inflation and thereby interest rates.

JOURNALIST:

(inaudible)

COSTELLO:

Look we have shown that the plan to be legislated to take effect over the next three years will keep the Budget in surplus at one per cent or greater. We’ve shown that in the mid year review. Now to go on and to complete the last two years of the five year goal will require the economy to continue to grow. If it continues to grow as we forecast it will, this will be capable of completion.

JOURNALIST:

(inaudible)

COSTELLO:

Well I’m very confident now that just as the Australian economy, we are forecasting, will continue to grow over the next three years, properly managed, properly managed will continue to grow and allow us to complete the last leg. I wouldn’t bet anything on it if there were a change of government.

COSTELLO:

Sorry can I just take this one first? Steve and then Tim.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, the $36 billion tax cut announced in the Budget, $36 billion, you got no bounce out of that. Are you concerned that there is a, perhaps a sort of complacency in the electorate and that you’re not going to get bounce out of this tax break?

COSTELLO:

I think we have an opportunity now to get the Australian tax system competitive. Competitive with other countries around the world and competitive in encouraging people to join it. This is serious reform. This is a five year goal which as you saw will have, what was it, 98 per cent of Australians on a top rate of 35 cents or less. This is a goal that would have low income earners paying no tax until they go above $20,000. Now I’ve shown you how in three years we can get very close to that goal and I have every confidence that we can complete it in the two years thereafter. Now I think Australians do want help with their cost of living pressures, yes of course I do, and this will deliver tax cuts for every Australian taxpayer. That’s good. But also this will deliver Australia an internationally competitive personal income tax system. When you think of where we’ve come in modernising indirect tax, in modernising capital gains tax, in modernising company tax, in the landmark reforms of superannuation, to be able to deliver this in personal income taxes is a great reform and it’s going for growth. Sorry, Tim was it?

JOURNALIST:

Ah yeah, I just wanting to clarify, the three stages you spelled out (inaudible)

COSTELLO:

That’s exactly right. The plan is for the next three years with the rates and the thresholds as they will be on the first of July for each of the next three years. The goal is for two years after that and if we implement our plan then that goal will be well within delivery.

JOURNALIST:

5000 jobs, you mentioned, that’s three years or …

COSTELLO:

Yes that’s if I can take you to the, it’s chart three in the press release, Tim, on page four.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, are you confident that these….that you will be able to keep to that three year schedule if there were a fall in commodity prices?

COSTELLO:

Well the mid year review sets out all of our assumptions. The mid year review also includes an assumption about a return to more normal commodity prices in the projection years. So we built in an estimate which is very prudent.

JOURNALIST:

Prime Minister Howard, $34 billion isn’t a bad opening up on day one, are you challenging Mr Rudd to say me too?

HOWARD:

Mr Rudd can respond in any way he thinks fit. I would just make the point, Mark, that this is a very carefully thought through affordable, detailed and serious plan about further major tax reform and I’ll just make the additional point that we’ve heard a lot from Mr Rudd and you mentioned him, I didn’t, but we’ve heard a lot from Mr Rudd about cost of living pressures. We’ve been promised inquiries and we’ve had stunts and we’ve had shopping centre visits, but rather than try and fiddle with a committee on prices, isn’t it better to give people additional purchasing power via a tax cut. Isn’t it better to say well here is additional tax relief particularly for low income people, let them decide how they spend it rather then the government fiddling with a housing affordability policy which might add to the cost of buying the first home? Isn’t it better to do this rather than to fiddle with the excise on petrol which can be wiped out with some kind of variation in the world price of crude oil. I mean the infinitely fairer, economically more responsible way of dealing with cost of living pressures is to actually give to the average taxpayer the wherewithal to deal with the pressures in the way that he or she thinks fit; not for the government to say well we think that pressure is worth relieving but that pressure over there is not deserving of relief. That is the case for across the board tax relief, the cost of living argument in favour of across the board tax relief quite apart from the workforce participation and long-term capacity building benefits of lower rates of tax.

Yes you’ve been trying, Mr Coorey has been politely and desperately trying.

JOURNALIST:

(inaudible) does that mean you’re not going to have a housing affordability policy?

HOWARD:

No it doesn’t mean that, just listen carefully; what it means is that we’re not going to embrace policies in any of these areas that actually aggravate the problem. And, I mean, the problem of housing is that over a period of time is land has become far too expensive and that flows from a number of things and it’s much harder now because of that to buy your first home but you don’t solve the housing affordability problem by doing things that further increase the cost and the price of housing. But that doesn’t mean to say we will remain silent on the issue, don’t think that for a moment.

JOURNALIST:

(Inaudible) the mid year statement. Both of you have been calling on Kevin Rudd for the last few weeks if not months to put out his tax policy. Wouldn’t it have been irresponsible if he’d one if before this statement was available?

HOWARD:

No, not at all, not at all because he’s had 11 years or his party has, to produce a tax policy.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Howard, how do you respond to Kevin Rudd’s challenge today that you outline the further reforms you’ll make to WorkChoices if you win?

HOWARD:

Well I haven’t outlined any further changes. I regard the current state of WorkChoices and the industrial relations legislation as right. We brought in a Fairness Test and we don’t have any secret further changes to WorkChoices in a drawer or in our pocket or on a computer or anywhere. We think we’ve got the balance right. We’re concerned that if he wins, particularly small business will suffer because he’s going to bring back the dreaded unfair dismissal laws that will send our falling unemployment into reverse. I mean, you can bank on this, if Mr Rudd becomes Prime Minister, unemployment will go up.

JOURNALIST:

The Labor Party has been suggesting that you would like to go further on…

HOWARD:

Me?

JOURNALIST:

That Mr Costello would like to go further on WorkChoices. Can you guarantee that if the Prime Minister retires and you’re elected Prime Minister that you, or that are, you become Prime Minister without being elected that you are not going do further…

COSTELLO:

I can guarantee you that I thoroughly support our current policy, absolutely, absolutely.

JOURNALIST:

It’s a rather different thing though.

COSTELLO:

Well whatever you would like me to say Michelle, I’ll say because you know, I think I’m making it entirely clear. I thoroughly support the policy, I don’t believe that it requires changes. Is that enough?

JOURNALIST:

But can you, can you definitively rule out…

COSTELLO:

Yes, I can.

JOURNALIST:

What was the gestation period for this tax policy? When did you start working on it and does it constrain in any way your ability to make other spending promises…

HOWARD:

Who’s that question directed at? Peter?

JOURNALIST:

Well whoever would like to answer it.

COSTELLO:

We’ve been working on this tax policy for a long time, you know, you don’t just produce a book like that overnight. There’s a lot of work and the detail is in there and it’s fully costed and it’s fully paid for and after it’s done the Budget is still in surplus by one per cent or greater of GDP. Now, we believe that a surplus of around 1 per cent of GDP is responsible economic policy. So that’s how we’re going into this election. I don’t know what Mr Rudd thinks, but that’s what we have laid down, that’s what we believe. We think that’s consistent with Budget policy and we have done that consistent with this aspirational tax plan.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, why have you left the top personal rate even at the end of your aspirational period, well above the company rate?

COSTELLO:

Well it will be 40 per cent Paul. The company rate is 30 per cent, the gap is narrowing. When I became Treasurer the top company tax rate was 36 and the top tax rate was 47. So they both will have come down by six or seven per cent, they’re both lower now…

JOURNALIST:

But the argument many economists put up is that they should be in line for reasons…

COSTELLO:

Yeah well, I think there was a period…

JOURNALIST:

…tax avoidance and other things…

COSTELLO:

Well I’ll just make two points…

HOWARD:

We’ll have total nirvana one day, in 100 years.

COSTELLO:

I’ll make two points. I think once, for a very short period of time they were aligned in the 80’s if my memory serves me right at something like 46 or 48 per cent, so alignment is not the point, competitiveness is the point. The second thing I’d point out to you, of course, is that with full dividend imputation now, any dividend that comes out of a company gets a full 30 per cent rebate and you pay the difference. If your tax rate is lower you actually get the difference back and that’s something that this government introduced Paul.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, after this announcement today, how much more have you got in the kit to spend during the campaign to keep that surplus at 1 per cent GDP.

COSTELLO:

Well you can examine the figures but you’ll find that this is costed, funded, responsible and we still have a surplus and, you know, can I point out to you there aren’t that many other comparable countries in the world that are where we are. Certainly not America, not Britain…

JOURNALIST:

So how much more have you got to spend in the campaign?

COSTELLO:

…not France, Germany, Europe, Japan. This is a pretty responsible position to be in and not only do we have a Budget surplus, we’ve cleared Commonwealth debt which is now saving the Australian taxpayer $9 billion a year.

JOURNALIST:

So how much more can you spend to keep a surplus of 1 per cent GST?

COSTELLO:

Well as I said to you this is a responsible policy.

JOURNALIST:

Will you be addressing business taxation separately in this campaign or do you think this…

COSTELLO:

Well I think business would support these reforms and I’ll tell you why. One of the things you’ll hear from business these days in some parts of Australia is they can’t get enough employees. There are some businesses that cite labour shortage as their number one problem. Now if you increase the effective tax free threshold and if you make sure that lower income earners won’t face a rate higher than 15 per cent you’re encouraging more people into the workforce. If you reduce your top tax rates, and this will reduce it, lower than the OECD average, you make your country more attractive for skilled immigrants, people who can bring particular skills from all around the world. And I think business will like this because this is an economic plan. This is about building capacity and the point as I said earlier you wouldn’t be able to do this if we didn’t have an extra 100,000 people in work. If you can get another 100,000 extra people in work in a year or two years time these are the sorts of things you can do again.

JOURNALIST:

You say that you’re increasing, you would increase household spending power through this which would help with petrol bills etc, but what about things such as schools and hospitals Isn’t there an argument this money would be better spent on capital works like that?

HOWARD:

Well, we are in favour of more investment in both education and health and we’ve announced it. I mean, the implication, I don’t think you really mean it but a possible implication of your question is that we have neglected those areas.

JOURNALIST:

Well hasn’t spending been cut on public hospitals?

HOWARD:

No, it hasn’t been cut, no spending’s been increased. It’s been increased, and it will be, can I tell you now, we will if we’re re-elected, we will be investing more in the Australian health care agreements, we’ll provide more money for public hospitals around Australia in the next five year health care agreement than is provided under the current one and that is quite apart from all the measures we’ve taken to strengthen Medicare, the safety net and the like. But we’ll also be requiring better administration. I mean, you don’t solve the public hospital crisis of New South Wales by giving Reba Meagher more money to spend unless you’ve got a better regime. I mean, you know really, if I could just say in relation to this how anybody living in western Sydney would contemplate voting Labor federally when they see the mess that Labor at a state level has made of public hospitals and public transport in New South Wales for example, you know, completely and utterly escapes me. We believe in local control for public hospitals and one of the conditions of our policy when it’s announced in detail, and there will be a detailed policy on public hospitals to be released by the Coalition, we will encompass the issue of local control.

JOURNALIST:

Mr Howard, would you describe this tax policy as your, as the lynchpin of your re-election bid?

HOWARD:

Look, that is commentary. What this is, is a bold plan for Australia’s future to keep our nation growing, to give people incentive to work, to maintain the transition towards an opportunity society where people are encouraged to work harder and to take risks. I mean, that’s what I’m interested in and I’ll leave lynchpins and cornerstones and forks and all of those other things that, you know, and committees and commissions, you know I’ll leave all of that to somebody else. Yes?

JOURNALIST:

You did say a couple of months ago that you had no more rabbits to pull out of the hat. Has one just re-appeared on day one of the election campaign?

HOWARD:

Look, that’s, you were inaccurately briefed out of a party room meeting.

JOURNALIST:

Just on who this policy was in part aimed at women who work part time. Do you believe that the incentives haven’t been there? Is this an admission that it’s not working for some families?

HOWARD:

When I say, it wasn’t, I mean it’s aimed at everybody but one of the spectacular, stunning, consequences of this is that remarkable figure I gave you, that 65 per cent of women with children in the part time workforce by 2010 will be on a marginal tax rate of no more than 15 per cent. Now when you bear in mind that, you know, a very typical family arrangement now is the father, the husband working full time and earning at or near or above AWE and his wife in the part-time workforce, now what I am saying is 65 per cent of those by 2010 will be on a marginal tax rate of no more than 15 per cent. Now that is an amazing reform and it is a contemporary modern reform that recognises that nature of family arrangements. I think it is terrific.

JOURNALIST:

Is that how you plan for them to have more money to spend on childcare or do you think there’s still room for more childcare reform?

HOWARD:

Look, I am told that on average about 65 per cent of the cost of childcare is defrayed by various government payments and tax benefits. It is about 65 per cent. Now you can always argue that it should be more but, you know, there are arguments and we will have something to say about childcare during the course of the campaign. But what I am saying about this is that it does provide an incentive for part-time workforce participation and many parents now want a situation where Dad is full-time in the workforce and Mum is, thinks the right thing in order to balance work and family responsibilities is to go back to work part-time, not full-time and that is an increasing formation. The point I am making is that this is facilitatory of that, this encourages that, supports that choice and isn’t that a terrific thing?

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, you’ve announced, in the 06-07 budget the surplus was 1.7 per cent of GDP. You’re bringing it down to 1.3. You’ve announced about $16 billion worth of spending since the Budget and you haven’t gone through the Budget (inaudible) campaign promises. How can you argue that none of that is inflationary and an economy running at close to capacity as Glenn Stevens has repeatedly pointed out?

COSTELLO:

Well if you go to page 255, the Budget outcome in 2006-07 was 1.6 per cent of GDP. In 2007-08 we are expecting 1.3 per cent. In 2008-09, 1.2 per cent. 2009-10, about 1.4 per cent. That is remarkably consistent. The movement from year to year is very small indeed. And I would make two points. One is, of course, that if we didn’t cut taxes for all Australians, your tax to GDP revenues would rise, would rise, and we are not about increasing tax to GDP revenues, we are about decreasing them. The second is that this is part of building capacity. I saw a survey the other day, I can’t quite remember which one it was, but business was asked to name the number one problem for small business and they said labour shortage. What business is telling you is what is constraining our capacity now is getting people to fill the jobs. Now, where are we going to get people to fill the jobs? I am encouraging Australians to have more kids. That might help in 20 years time but we have got to encourage people to join the workforce. And what better way of doing that than increasing the effective tax free threshold and then increasing the threshold at which you are only taxed up to 15 per cent. And if you have a plan where you are not going to go above 15 per cent as your top marginal tax rate to $37,000, this is what the Prime Minister was saying, many women coming back into the workforce working a day or two, they won’t go above $37,000. So their top tax rate won’t be their average, their top tax rate will be 15 cents in the dollar.

JOURNALIST:

But isn’t the more pressing issue the skills shortages problem and this won’t go towards that will it?

COSTELLO:

Well let me say the Government is doing more to build skills in Australia than any other government in Australian history, including the announcement which I made in the Budget by the way, of the $500 voucher against TAFE fees and the $1,000 wage subsidy to encourage people to take up apprenticeships in areas where there are shortages. And the other point I will make about this tax plan is that one of the reasons why we are reducing those top rates from 45 down to 42, and our goal is to go low as you know, is again, in the world market for skilled people these things count. They can make a difference and this will take us below the OECD average for the top marginal tax rate.

JOURNALIST:

Treasurer, how much do the tax cuts cost over five years and given the history of previous administrations promising LAW law tax cuts what guarantee can you give of the tax cuts coming through…

COSTELLO:

Well, the tax cuts which we are introducing are fully paid for. And when you say, you know, given previous records of previous administrations, let’s call a spade a spade, given the Labor Party’s broken promises on tax, can you believe the Coalition? The answer is ‘yes.’

HOWARD:

We haven’t taken any back.

COSTELLO:

Never. In fact, as I recall the last lot of tax cuts were in May of this year. Rather than taking them back, we are actually taking them forward.

HOWARD:

Last question. Katherine.

COSTELLO:

Katherine.

JOURNALIST:

You’ve done a lot of work as Treasurer Mr Costello on (inaudible). Are both of you confident that you’ve got the balance right between dealing with the participation problem now and dealing with future pressures on (inaudible)?

COSTELLO:

Well I am, because I think this is a much better tax system. This is really going to be a competitive tax system. We couldn’t have done this before. We can do this because our economy has grown, more people are in work. And I have no doubt that Australia will be a stronger and more sustainable place with a competitive, an internationally competitive tax system. This is what we are about, these are the fruits of good economic management and this is the plan for further reform.

HOWARD:

Can I just add to that we as a Party actually believe and hold to the philosophy of lower tax. And I was asked a moment ago what the gestation period of this was, in a sense, we never stop thinking about tax relief because we think that there is an obligation on a government, where it has the opportunity to do so, to return people’s money to them by the way of tax relief. Thank you.

COSTELLO:

Thank you.

Costello Delivers Howard Government’s 12th Budget

The Treasurer, Peter Costello, has delivered the 12th Budget of the Howard Government.

The budget will take the government through to this year’s election.

Listen to Peter Costello Deliver the 2007-08 Budget:

  • Read the official Budget Speech from the Treasurer, Peter Costello (PDF)

  • Budget At-A-Glance (PDF)

  • Budget Overview (PDF)

    This is the text of the 2007-08 Federal Budget Speech, delivered to the House of Representatives, by the Treasurer, Peter Costello.

    Mr Speaker, I move that the Bill now be read a second time.

    INTRODUCTION

    Australia is different to the way it was 10 years ago.

    Our economy is about 1½ times larger than it was back in 1996.

    We have another 2 million Australians who have found jobs since then. And average
    wages have increased 20 per cent in real terms.

    In the decade before 1996 inflation averaged 5 per cent a year. Since then inflation has
    halved, averaging the low and stable rate of 2½ per cent a year.

    Ten years ago the Australian Government owed a net debt of $96 billion. The
    Government was paying an interest bill of $8.5 billion a year. Today we are debt free in
    net terms. And our net interest payments are zero. This is saving taxpayers $8.5 billion
    a year.

    Back in 1996 the Budget was in deficit. We were living beyond our means. Today we
    are living within our means. For the 10th time, I am outlining a Budget that will be in
    surplus.

    We have come a long way and made a lot of progress. This year’s Budget has been
    framed to lock in that progress:- to keep people in jobs; to keep our living standards
    up. We don’t want to lose all that we have achieved over the last 10 years. We want to
    lock in the gains and move forward.

    The next decade will bring challenges all of its own — the ageing of the population,
    health care, aged care, the emergence of climate change, the instability of our region
    and the global shocks which can threaten our economy.

    If we lock in the achievements of the past this will help us with the challenges of the
    future. We want to meet and deal with future challenges from a position of strength.

    This is a Budget which will build our economic capacity and give us that strength.

    Tonight I will explain how we will invest for the future.

    I will outline steps which will grow our economy.

    I will introduce measures to give a helping hand to those who are struggling.

    I will detail proposals to improve and conserve our natural environment — our water
    and our riverways.

    And this Budget will fund the national security and defence preparedness we need to
    protect our country.

    Two years ago I announced the Government would establish a Future Fund to invest
    now for liabilities that are falling due for payment in the years which lie ahead. The
    Fund is established and is well on its way. It will help pay entitlements to our soldiers,
    navy and air force personnel which must be honoured after they have retired and
    finished their service to the nation. The Fund operates as an accumulation fund and
    reinvests its earnings. It aims to meet its target by 2020.

    If you rob capital or earnings from the Future Fund, taxpayers will have to make up
    the difference. You are passing our bills, our obligations, from our generation to the
    next. This will limit their future. We will strongly oppose any irresponsible attempt to
    raid this national investment for cheap political advantage.

    HIGHER EDUCATION ENDOWMENT FUND

    We do not want to limit the future chances of young Australians, we want to build
    them. So tonight I announce another investment in the future. For the first time ever,
    the Australian Government will establish an endowment fund — the Higher
    Education Endowment Fund (HEEF) — as a perpetual fund to generate earnings for
    capital works and research facilities in our institutions of higher learning.

    The initial investment of $5 billion out of this year’s Budget surplus will broadly
    double all the existing financial investments and endowments currently held in the
    total university sector.

    The capital will not be spent. It will be invested. And, what is more, we will add
    further capital from future Budget outcomes to this perpetual fund.

    Individuals who wish to contribute to this visionary initiative will be able to make tax
    deductible gifts to be managed along with the Government endowment. The
    Endowment will be managed by the Guardians of the Future Fund.

    The earnings generated by this investment will be dedicated to building first class
    institutes of learning — first class by world standards — and put our Institutes of
    Higher Learning on a secure footing for ever.

    In addition to this, tonight I announce a plan to improve the education system so as to
    help all young people achieve their full potential.

    This $3.5 billion plan called Realising Our Potential has three components. At the school
    level it means improving numeracy and literacy. At the training level it means better
    vocational education and more apprenticeships. At the tertiary level it means better
    universities which are more responsive to student needs.

    IMPROVING SCHOOL OUTCOMES

    Every parent is entitled to expect that their child will receive a high quality education
    and develop the basic skills they need in later life. If children fall behind early they
    find it very hard to catch up.

    From 1 January next year we will help those children who do not achieve national
    literacy and numeracy benchmarks in Years 3 and 5 and 7 by providing a voucher to
    their parents for extra tuition outside of school. The voucher will be for $700. It can
    only be used for tuition. It is designed to give those children who need it specialized,
    personal, assistance.

    If we want to improve literacy and numeracy we also need to recognise and reward
    those teachers and those schools that do well in teaching our children.

    In 2008 there will be a bonus up to $50,000 available to schools that make significant
    improvements in the literacy and numeracy standards in their schools. This will
    reward school excellence.

    The Government will also provide $102 million from 2008 to establish Summer Schools
    for teachers to undertake professional development for teaching in the areas of
    Literacy and Numeracy, Australian History, Maths, Science and English. Teachers who
    attend these summer schools in their own time, will receive a $5,000 bonus from the
    Australian Government on completing the course.

    The Government will also provide additional funding of $77 million from 2008 to get
    more practical experience for those training to be teachers. We will pay Institutions to
    provide a minimum 120 days experience in schools for trainee teachers who are doing
    three and four-year degrees.

    VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING

    The Australian Government is a strong supporter of vocational education and training
    (VET). The recent Skills for the Future package committed $837 million in new funding
    to support skills training in the sector. We need more tradesmen and women. We need
    to get more young people into apprenticeships.

    That is why we will introduce a new tax exempt payment of $1,000 to first and second
    year apprentices in skill-shortage trades to top up their wages. It will be for those
    under 30 years of age. It will give them better wages while they are training. First and
    second year apprentices in skill-shortage trades, regardless of age, will also be entitled
    to a voucher of $500 which they can use to help offset course fees for their training.
    This will encourage more people to take up apprenticeships at a cost of $549 million
    over four years.

    An additional $84 million over five years will be provided to establish three new
    Australian Technical Colleges in the Brisbane, Sydney and Perth areas; to add to the 25
    being established around Australia.

    HIGHER EDUCATION

    The Budget also includes an additional $768 million over four years to increase the
    capacity of universities to respond more flexibly to student demand:- allowing them to
    enrol more students in courses that students want to study and simplifying
    Commonwealth funding arrangements.

    We will also provide an additional 3,500 Commonwealth Learning Scholarships for
    university study over four years.

    These measures for primary education, for apprentices and for higher education will
    boost the skills of our workforce and expand Australia’s productive capacity. More
    than ever Australia needs to be smarter and more productive to keep ahead of the
    pack.

    INCOME TAX CUTS

    Mr Speaker, if we want our economy to grow we must ensure there are strong
    incentives for people to join the workforce and reward them for better skills and better
    effort.

    We commenced cutting personal income tax in 2000.

    We have cut taxes in the last four Budgets.

    Tonight I announce income tax cuts for the fifth year in a row. These tax cuts will take
    effect in two stages: from 1 July 2007 and 1 July 2008.

    From 1 July this year, the 30 per cent tax rate will only apply to income over $30,000:-
    up from the current threshold of $25,000.

    The low income tax offset will also rise from $600 to $750 and will begin to phase-out
    from $30,000. This means that low income earners eligible for the offset will not pay
    tax until their annual income exceeds $11,000.

    For a person on average wages the tax cut I announce tonight will be around $16 a
    week. For those below it can be more, for example, at $30,000 the tax cut will be $21 a
    week.

    These tax changes provide further incentives for those outside the workforce to enter it
    and for those in part-time work to take additional hours.

    Taxpayers earning $30,000 paid $6,222 in income tax in 1999. From 1 July 2007 they
    will only pay $2,850 — a reduction of around 54 per cent.

    From 1 July next year, we will increase the 40 per cent threshold from $75,000 to
    $80,000 and the 45 per cent threshold from $150,000 to $180,000.

    These income tax changes will ensure that more than 80 per cent of taxpayers face a
    top marginal tax rate of 30 per cent or less across the forward estimates period. They
    mean the top tax rate only applies to around 2 per cent of taxpayers. Back in 1996 the
    top marginal rate — which was higher than it is today — applied from $50,000. If that
    threshold had been indexed it would have stood below $68,000 on 1 July next year. In
    fact it will be $180,000.

    Senior Australians who are eligible for the senior Australians tax offset will now pay
    no tax on their annual income up to $25,867 for singles and up to $43,360 for couples.
    Our tax system exists to fund the decent services in health, education, aged care, and
    other services that Australians legitimately expect and are entitled to receive. If after
    we provide for those services, invest for the future, and balance our Budget, we can
    reduce the tax burden, we should do so.

    Tonight I am also announcing a programme to dramatically simplify income tax
    returns for the next financial year commencing on 1 July 2007.

    Taxpayers will be able to go online to access an income tax return prepared by the
    Commissioner of Taxation, including income from salary and wages, interest,
    dividends, information on private health insurance, and any benefits paid from the
    Government, including the family tax benefit.

    If the taxpayer is satisfied with this pre-prepared statement, they will be able to click
    online and file their return without any further action. If there is additional
    information to provide, this can be added to the pre-prepared return.

    This will be available for the 9 million taxpayers who currently lodge their tax return
    electronically, either directly or through a tax agent. There are 10 million taxpayers in
    Australia.

    IMPROVING CHILD CARE ARRANGEMENTS

    Part of helping families to balance work and parenthood is to assist with child care.
    Government assistance for child care in 2007-08 will be $3 billion, nearly three times
    the level in 1996-97.

    From 1 July 2007, the rates of Child Care Benefit will increase by 10 per cent, on top of
    indexation. This will increase the maximum rate of Child Care Benefit from $2.96 to
    $3.37 per hour, meaning that a family on maximum rate assistance with one child in
    Long Day Care for 40 hours per week will be eligible for $134.80 per week. This change
    will provide $728 million in extra assistance to more than 700,000 families.

    The Government will also reimburse 30 per cent of the remaining out-of-pocket
    expenses after the payment of the Benefit. From 1 July 2007, families will receive the
    30 per cent Child Care Tax Rebate as a direct payment shortly after the financial year
    in which they incur out-of-pocket child care costs. Families who incur out-of-pocket
    child care costs in both 2005-06 and 2006-07 will receive two rebates in 2007-08 — one
    through the tax system under existing arrangements, and the other as a direct
    payment. The maximum payment will be $4,096 per child in respect of 2005-06 and
    $4,211 per child for 2006-07.

    This reform will help mothers who want to take part in the paid workforce to do so.

    BOOSTING INVESTMENT IN LAND TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

    Mr Speaker, a high quality transport network underpins our nation’s productivity,
    economic growth and prosperity.

    The Government has a strategic plan to develop this network called AusLink.

    We have invested $15.8 billion in road and rail projects like the Pacific Highway, the
    Deer Park Bypass, and the Caboolture Motorway.

    Tonight I am announcing that the Government will boost its investment in road and
    rail infrastructure with the second AusLink plan and total funding of $22.3 billion over
    five years from 2009-10.

    The National Network of road and rail is critical to our economy and provides the link
    between Australia’s major population and economic centres. It is the link for our
    exports to the world.

    AusLink 2 will help reduce accidents on Australian roads. The Black Spot Programme
    will increase to $60 million per annum over the five years from 2009-10. The Roads to
    Recovery Programme constructs and maintains local roads and will be funded with
    $1.8 billion. The Strategic Regional Programme supports the growth of regional
    industry and will be allocated $300 million.

    In order to bring forward construction of some of these strategic regional roads I am
    announcing tonight an additional $250 million of supplementary funding to be paid to
    local councils before June 30.

    SUPPORTING RETIREMENT SAVINGS

    Mr Speaker, encouraging people to save for retirement is critical to meet the challenges
    posed by the ageing of the population.

    In last year’s Budget I announced the most comprehensive reform of Australia’s
    superannuation system ever. Taxes on benefits paid from a taxed fund to those over 60
    will be abolished from 1 July 2007 — no tax on pensions, no tax on lump sums.

    Another superannuation incentive for people on low to middle incomes is the
    co-contribution scheme where the Government matches $1.50 for each $1.00 a person
    contributes from their own money to superannuation. In order to reward this saving
    further, the Government will pay an additional one-off to double the co-contribution in
    respect of the 2005-06 year.

    This means an eligible person who contributed $1,000 will receive a co-contribution of
    $3,000 from the Government for that year.

    This will boost the superannuation savings of low and middle income earners by
    $1.1 billion.

    REWARDING OLDER AUSTRALIANS

    Mr Speaker, since this Budget will boost the take home pay of those in the workforce,
    we also want to assist older Australians of retirement age.

    This year the Government will provide a one-off seniors bonus payment of $500 to all
    individuals of Age or Service Pension age eligible for either the Utilities Allowance or
    the Seniors Concession Allowance as at 8 May 2007. This payment will also be made to
    all recipients of Mature Age Allowance, Widows Allowance and Partner Allowance as
    at 8 May 2007.

    I also announce tonight, for the fourth consecutive year, that recipients of the Carer
    Payment will receive a bonus of $1,000 and recipients of the Carer Allowance a bonus
    of $600 for each eligible person in their care. These are people who look after others
    with a disability and help those unable to fully care for themselves. They deserve this
    support.

    Both the seniors and the carers bonuses will be paid by 30 June 2007. These payments
    will be tax-free and not treated as income when calculating social security payments.
    These measures will cost $1.7 billion in 2006-07.

    These bonuses show we can extend the benefits of a strong economy to those outside
    the workforce. It recognises the contribution older Australians have made to building
    our economy. It lends a helping hand to our carers.

    The Government will also increase the Special Rate and Intermediate Rate Veteran
    disability pensions by $50 and $25 per fortnight respectively, with effect from
    July 2007.

    ACCESSIBLE AND AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE

    Mr Speaker, the Government is committed to ensuring Australia’s health care system
    remains accessible and sustainable into the future.

    In 2007-08 the Government will spend $51.8 billion on health and aged care, up from
    $20 billion in 1996-97.

    Our medical scientists have made Australia a world leader in health and medical
    research. Building on previous Budget investment in this area, tonight I announce the
    Government will provide $486 million in grants this year to construct further
    world-class health and medical research facilities. Our scientists are among the best in
    the world. We want to support their work to unlock treatments to deal with
    debilitating and degenerative diseases.

    And the Budget funds new pharmaceuticals to deal with conditions like diabetes that
    affect so many Australians. By keeping our PBS competitive we can give access to new
    treatments.

    Being overweight or obese is a major risk factor for chronic diseases including
    diabetes, heart disease and stroke. This Budget provides an additional $150 million
    over four years for a package of measures to improve nutrition and encourage physical
    activity, including structured physical activity for children after school. This will
    encourage them to adopt healthier lifestyles.

    Mr Speaker, while primary responsibility for dental care lies with State and Territory
    governments, the Australian Government has responsibility for funding dental
    training and funding general health services through Medicare.

    This Budget provides funding of $65 million over four years to establish a new
    regional dental school, with 60 additional dentistry places in regional centres. The
    Government will also provide $12.5 million over four years to create more
    opportunities for city dental students to undertake dental training in regional settings.

    And tonight I am announcing additional Medicare funding of $378 million over four
    years for patients whose dental health is impacting on a chronic medical condition.

    A Medicare benefit up to $2,125 per year will be available for their dental treatment in
    the private sector as referred by a doctor.

    MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF CLIMATE CHANGE

    Mr Speaker, one of the great challenges we have is to maintain the beautiful, diverse
    and precious natural environment we have in Australia.

    Our responsibility is to manage the environment for future generations. One of the
    serious long term threats is global warming.

    Since 1996, the Government has invested $2 billion to develop practical responses to
    counter and reduce climate change.

    The Government’s $500 million Low Emissions Technology Demonstration Fund is
    already driving the development of solar and clean coal technologies that are vital in
    this regard.

    We want to encourage homeowners to install solar panels across Australia. The current
    rebates will be doubled so that households will receive up to $8,000 for installing an
    average system, which costs around $14,000, a rebate of over 50 per cent. Grants of up
    to $12,000 will be available for solar panels in schools and community buildings.
    Forests play a key role in reducing greenhouse gases. Tonight I announce that the costs
    of establishing qualifying carbon sink forests will be tax deductible with immediate
    deductibility for five years commencing 1 July 2007 and concessional depreciation
    arrangements after that.

    This Budget provides $197 million over five years for the Global Initiative on Forests
    and Climate. This initiative will assist developing countries to manage and maintain —
    rather than slash and burn — their precious tropical forests.

    And this will be complemented by the establishment of partnerships with developing
    countries to support water management, energy efficiency and alternative energy
    initiatives.

    A new Australian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation will be established. The
    CSIRO will be allocated $103 million for Climate Change and Energy Research. All this
    work will help Australia respond to the great challenge of global warming.

    A NATIONAL PLAN FOR WATER SECURITY

    Mr Speaker, water is one of Australia’s most precious resources.

    The Government’s $10 billion National Plan for Water Security is intended to place
    rural water use on a sustainable footing over the next decade. This plan includes
    $5.9 billion to increase the efficiency of water use in irrigation and $3.1 billion to
    address over-allocation of water.

    Tonight I announce funding of $201 million over six years to support the installation of
    water tanks and other water saving devices by schools and community organisations.
    We must capture as much of this precious resource as possible and use it carefully and
    wisely.

    PROTECTING OUR NATURAL RESOURCES

    The Government is further extending the Natural Heritage Trust until June 2013, with
    an injection of $2 billion to support activities that improve water quality and reduce
    land degradation at the local, regional and national level. The Natural Heritage Trust is
    protecting wetlands, controlling salinity in the River Murray and dealing with nutrient
    run-off into the Great Barrier Reef.

    Farmers and other private land holders are frontline environmental managers for
    around 77 per cent of Australia’s land mass. Many of our rare and significant plants
    and animals are located on privately managed land.

    Tonight I announce a new Environmental Stewardship Programme, an innovative long
    term initiative which will engage the Australian Government in partnerships with
    landowners to protect and improve environmental assets on private land.

    The first of our natural assets to be targeted are the Box Gum Woodland areas that
    span inland from Queensland to Victoria. There is less than 5 per cent of this
    significant nationally endangered ecosystem left and much of it needs urgent work.

    RURAL AND REGIONAL AUSTRALIA

    Mr Speaker, large parts of our country are suffering badly from a once in a century
    drought which continues on with devastating effect to farmers and rural communities.

    Australians believe we should give a helping hand to those who are struggling.

    Combining last year and this year around $1.2 billion will be paid in exceptional
    circumstances drought assistance. Funding of $688 million in assistance is expected to
    be provided in 2007-08.

    Our assistance to drought affected farmers includes income support and loan
    assistance, counselling and support services.

    Tonight I announce an additional $205 million over four years to fund professional
    advice for farmers in severe difficulty, to subsidise management training and
    education and to provide re-establishment grants to assist those who wish to exit the
    industry.

    DEFENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY

    Mr Speaker, the Government has no higher responsibility than the defence of Australia
    and its interests.


    At present, members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) are serving their country
    with distinction in difficult and dangerous theatres.

    The Government recognises that improved recruitment and retention is necessary in
    order to ensure that we maintain the current high standards of our defence force and
    enable the ADF to grow to its intended strength of 57,000.

    Tonight I announce additional funding of $2.1 billion over ten years for a range of
    initiatives to further improve recruitment and retention, including an enhanced
    Defence home ownership assistance scheme, incentives for young Australians to take
    up a Defence apprenticeship in a technical trade, and an expanded cadet programme
    for young people.

    The Government is committed to ensuring our defence force is fully equipped to meet
    new and existing challenges. This Budget provides funding of $6.6 billion over
    13 years to acquire 24 F/A-18F Super Hornets to ensure Australia maintains air
    superiority in our region. The purchase will ensure a smooth transition to the
    F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and allow for the orderly retirement of the existing F-111 fleet.

    And our Government is committed to addressing emerging threats to national
    security.

    This Budget provides a further $702 million over four years for national security
    initiatives to further safeguard against terrorism, including high-priority intelligence
    needs, an integrated e-security national agenda, and further strengthening of aviation
    security.

    This brings to $10.4 billion the additional funding the Government has committed to
    national security over the ten years to 2010-11.

    ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

    Australia has now recorded the longest economic expansion in its history.

    Unemployment is at a 30 year low.

    I pay tribute to the enterprise of Australia’s small business people and the hard work
    of employees who can share credit for this standout performance.

    The orderly adjustment to the current strength in the terms of trade demonstrates the
    flexibility we have now built in the Australian economy.

    As a result, inflation is forecast to be 2½ per cent in 2007-08.

    Overall, GDP growth is forecast to be 3¾ per cent in 2007-08, reflecting an assumed
    return to average seasonal conditions in the farm sector and a partial recovery from the
    drought.

    Business investment has grown strongly in recent years, and is now at its highest level
    as a share of GDP in 32 years. This will boost capacity in the years ahead.

    This Budget — with its investment in education, skills, in road and rail, and sharper
    work incentives will add to that capacity. This investment will drive further economic
    growth.

    We must now lock in the progress of the last decade if we want to keep our living
    standards high. From this position we can step out to meet the challenges of the future
    with purpose and confidence.

    I commend the Bill to the House.

  • Costello Budget Gives Tax Cuts; Targets Education, Childcare, Aged, Environment

    The Federal Government has brought down the Budget that will take it to this year’s election.

    The Treasurer, Peter Costello, delivering his 12th Budget, announced:

  • A surplus of $10.6 billion.

  • Tax cuts: 30% threshold rises on July 1 from an income of $25,000 to $30,000; from 2008, the 40% threshold increases to $80,000 and the 45% threshold increases to $180,000.

  • Simplified Income Tax Returns.

  • University funding increased by $5 billion for capital works; additional income support for tertiary students.

  • $700 tutorial vouchers for parents with children not meeting literacy and numeracy benchmarks.

  • $5000 bonuses for teachers completing professional development courses; extra money to ensure trainee teachers have 100 days teaching practice in schools.

  • 10% increase in Child Care Benefit from July 1; Tax rebate to be made available sooner.

  • Additional money from 2009 for road and rail infrastructure.

  • One-off doubling of superannuation co-contribution.

  • $500 one-off bonus payment for older Australians; $600 and $1000 Carer Payment bonuses.

  • $8000 rebates for solar panel installations.

  • Additional drought and Exceptional Circumstances funding.

  • $6.1 billion over 10 years to assist Defence recruitment.

  • $772 million for improved detection and treatment of chronic and complex conditions.

    Full Budget Details

  • Complete Text of the Treasurer’s Budget Speech

    Listen to Peter Costello Deliver the 2007-08 Budget:

  • Budget At-A-Glance (PDF)

  • Budget Overview (PDF)